Biohydrogen: A Clean, Biological Path to Sustainable Energy

In the global pursuit of clean energy, biohydrogen, hydrogen gas (H₂) produced by biological sources, has emerged as a carbon-free, non-toxic, and high-efficiency fuel with the potential to revolutionize sustainable energy systems. Unlike conventional hydrogen production methods, biohydrogen leverages microbes (fermentative bacteria, photosynthetic bacteria, cyanobacteria, and microalgae) to convert biomass or sunlight into H₂, offering an eco-friendly and renewable alternative. Governments worldwide have recognized this promise, releasing hydrogen economy roadmaps to accelerate its adoption.

Recent advances in microbial biohydrogen production highlight its versatility, with processes like dark fermentation, photofermentation, and biophotolysis optimizing yields through tailored conditions (e.g., light intensity, pH, temperature, and nutrient supplementation).

However, scalability remains a challenge due to low production rates, technological bottlenecks, and storage constraints. Innovative solutions, such as genetic engineering, biomass pretreatments, and nanoparticle integration, are being explored to overcome these barriers.

Two main biological strategies are gaining momentum: bacterial fermentation and enzyme-driven production.

This blog post examines the state-of-the-art in biohydrogen production, from microbial pathways to real-world applications. We also outline future strategies to enhance viability, including waste-to-hydrogen systems and circular economy approaches. By addressing these challenges, biohydrogen

could transition from a promising concept to a cornerstone of the global renewable energy landscape.

Bacterial and Algae Fermentation

Dark Fermentation

Dark fermentation employs anaerobic bacteria to break down organic materials, such as agricultural waste or food scraps, into hydrogen. This method is attractive because it is energy-efficient and uses low-cost substrates.

A new review highlights that dark fermentation is the most scalable biological hydrogen method available today [Albuquerque et al. 2024]. Clostridium species, operating under optimized conditions (pH 5.5–6.0, 35–37 °C), typically achieve biohydrogen yields of ~2 mol H₂/mol glucose, with gas-phase concentrations of 2–3 g/L [Sanghvi et al., 2024]. However, these yields remain suboptimal due to metabolic inefficiencies, including the accumulation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) that inhibit further H₂ production. Recent studies demonstrate that reactor configuration and operational parameters critically influence performance. For instance, continuous systems using sugar beet molasses as a substrate achieved record yields of 208.3 L H₂/L/day under aggressive conditions (OLR: 850 g COD/L/day, pH 4.4, HRT: 8 h), far surpassing conventional batch systems (29–40 L H₂/L/day at HRT 2–3 h, pH 4–6).

To address inefficiencies, artificial intelligence (AI) tools (e.g., neural networks, support vector machines) are now being deployed to model and optimize parameters like pH, OLR, and HRT in real time. These advancements, coupled with life cycle (LCA) and techno-economic analyses (TEA), highlight pathways to scale-up, though challenges persist, including energy-intensive reactor operation and VFA management. Future efforts must prioritize AI-driven process control, substrate flexibility (e.g., waste-derived feedstocks), and integrated systems to enhance viability. By refining these factors, biohydrogen could transition from a promising lab-scale process to a cornerstone of

sustainable energy systems, mitigating fossil fuel dependence and reducing greenhouse gas emissions [Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki et al. 2022; Sanghvi et al. 2024].

Photofermentation

Photofermentation harnesses photosynthetic bacteria (e.g., Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Rhodospirillum rubrum) and microalgae (e.g., Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) to produce hydrogen (H₂) under light exposure.

These organisms employ distinct enzymatic pathways:

• Nitrogenase-mediated production in bacteria (e.g., Rhodobacter), which fixes nitrogen while simultaneously generating H₂ as a byproduct, even under nitrogen-limited conditions [Mu et al., 2025]. Recent breakthroughs include genetic modifications to enhance proton pump expression in Rhodobacter, significantly improving ATP supply and doubling H₂ yields in some strains [Mu et al., 2025].

• Hydrogenase-driven production in algae, which directly splits water into H₂ and O₂. However, hydrogenase activity is highly oxygen-sensitive, necessitating anaerobic conditions or sulfur-deprivation protocols to induce H₂ production [Xuan et al., 2023].

Key Challenges

• Oxygen inhibition: Both nitrogenase and hydrogenase are deactivated by O₂, requiring costly anaerobic bioreactor designs or oxygen-scavenging additives (e.g., ascorbate) [Zhang et al., 2022].

• Light dependency: Low light-conversion efficiency (~1–3%) and uneven light penetration in large-scale reactors limit productivity. Strategies like wavelength-optimized LEDs and light-diffusing materials are being tested to address this [Mokhtarani et al., 2025].

• Substrate competition: Organic acids (e.g., acetate) are preferred substrates, but metabolic pathways often favor biomass growth over H₂ production. Genetic engineering to redirect carbon flux (e.g., knocking out polyhydroxybutyrate synthesis genes) is under investigation [Zhang et al., 2022].

Microbial Electrolysis

Microbial electrolysis complement photofermentation by using electroactive bacteria (e.g., Geobacter, Shewanella) to oxidize organic waste, generating electrons for H₂ production at the cathode under a small applied voltage (~0.2–0.8 V).

Recent studies highlight:

• Integrated systems: Coupling MECs with photofermentation can utilize residual organic acids (e.g., butyrate) from dark fermentation, boosting overall H₂ yields by 20–40% [Mokhtarani et al., 2025].

• Nanomaterial-enhanced cathodes: Graphene or platinum-doped electrodes reduce energy inputs and improve H₂ purity (>90%) [Zhang et al., 2022].

Barriers to Scale-Up

• Costs: Noble metal catalysts (e.g., Pt) and membrane materials (e.g., Nafion) dominate expenses. Alternatives like biochar-based electrodes are being explored.

• Process stability: Long-term operation faces biofilm fouling and pH fluctuations, necessitating AI-driven monitoring for real-time adjustments [Mokhtarani et al., 2025].

Future Directions

Genetic engineering: CRISPR-modified strains with O₂-tolerant hydrogenases or enhanced nitrogenase activity [Mu et al., 2025].

Hybrid systems: Combining photofermentation, MECs, and dark fermentation to maximize substrate utilization.

Additive optimization: Redox mediators (e.g., methyl viologen) and nanoparticles (e.g., TiO₂) to improve light absorption and electron transfer [Zhang et al., 2022].

Enzymatic Biohydrogen

Hydrogenase Enzymes

Hydrogenases are metalloenzymes that catalyze the reversible interconversion between H₂ and protons/electrons. These enzymes are phylogenetically widespread, occurring in prokaryotes, archaea, and some eukaryotes [Sickerman et al. 2019]. They are classified into three groups based on the transition metals at their active sites: [NiFe], [FeFe], and [Fe] hydrogenases [Ji et al. 2023]. Notably, some hydrogenases exhibit catalytic rates comparable to platinum while operating under mild conditions [Sickerman et al. 2019].

Enzymatic fuel cells (EFCs) utilizing hydrogenases for H₂ oxidation and bilirubin oxidase (BOD) for O₂ reduction represent a promising alternative to precious metal catalysts. Recent work emonstrates that optimizing electrode architecture significantly improves performance. A thermostable EFC system achieved continuous operation for 17 h with an energy output of 15.8 mW h when enzymes were immobilized in hierarchical carbon felt modified with carbon nanotubes Mazurenko et al. 2017]. Finite element modeling revealed optimal electrode parameters of <100 μm thickness and 60% porosity [Mazurenko et al. 2017]. This configuration yielded total turnover numbers of 10⁷ for BOD and 10⁸ for hydrogenase, with a massic activity of 1 A mg⁻¹ [Mazurenko et al. 2017].

A major limitation of hydrogenase-based systems is enzyme sensitivity to oxidative damage. This has been addressed through immobilization in redox- active polymers. A [FeFe]-hydrogenase embedded in a 2,2′-viologen-modified hydrogel demonstrated reversible H₂ oxidation/evolution, achieving an open circuit voltage of 1.16 V in a H₂/O₂ fuel cell configuration [Hardt et al. 2021].

Kinetic analysis confirmed that reversibility could be maintained despite relatively slow intermolecular electron transfer rates [Hardt et al. 2021].

These advances in enzyme stabilization and electrode design suggest practical applications for bioelectrocatalytic systems may be feasible. Further improvements in enzyme durability and electron transfer efficiency could enable broader implementation of hydrogenase-based technologies [Ji et al. 2023].

Challenges

Scale-Up and Stability Constraints

Microbial fermentative hydrogen production (e.g., Clostridium spp.) commonly yields ≤ 2 mol H₂/mol glucose, limited by competitive pathways producing acetate, butyrate, or ethanol. Photobiological systems (cyanobacteria, microalgae) rarely exceed solar-to-H₂ efficiencies of 1% at

scale due to light attenuation outdoors. Enzymatic approaches using [FeFe]- hydrogenases face operational instability, with enzyme inactivation by oxygen and Fe–S cluster degradation. Purified hydrogenases often lose activity within 48 h, demanding frequent replacement. Immobilization strategies (e.g., redox polymers, conductive scaffolds) can retain enzyme function but introduce

mass-transfer constraints, reducing activity by 30–60% [Pathy et al. 2022].

Economic and Infrastructure Barriers

Biological H₂ systems avoid platinum-group catalysts but require costly infrastructure: gas-separation membranes for mixed gas recovery and specialized photobioreactor materials balancing light and gas exchange.

Quality control for enzyme catalysts, especially assessing metal-cluster integrity, lacks standardized protocols [Yumnam et al. 2023].

Regulatory and Biosafety Considerations

Genetically modified organisms for enhanced H₂ production remain under strict regulation (e.g., EU Directive 2009/41/EC), often increasing capital costs by 15–20%. Risks like horizontal gene transfer (e.g., Rhodobacter) are non‑trivial (~10⁻⁴ in leakage scenarios). Additional concerns include reactive oxygen species formed during enzyme inactivation and their ecological

impacts [Yumnam et al. 2023].

Technological Integration Challenges

Microbial H₂ output (~80–85% purity) falls short of fuel-cell standards (≥ 99.97%), requiring expensive post-treatment like pressure-swing adsorption. Photobiological production varies diurnally, necessitating high-pressure (≧30 bar) storage to mitigate solubility losses [Pathy et al. 2022].

Future Perspectives

The future of biological hydrogen production lies in a convergence of disciplines, where biotechnology, enzymology, and chemical engineering intersect to address long-standing limitations in efficiency, stability, and scalability. Among the most promising developments is the potential to integrate microbial fermentation with enzymatic post-processing, specifically,

coupling the metabolic by-products of fermentative pathways with targeted enzymatic degradation or conversion steps. This modular approach enables increased hydrogen yields by optimizing energy extraction at each stage of the pathway and mitigating the accumulation of inhibitory by-products.

Advances in protein engineering further expand this frontier. The development of oxygen-tolerant [NiFe]-hydrogenases and synthetic analogs has opened the possibility of operating enzymatic hydrogen production under ambient conditions, thus reducing the complexity and cost of anaerobic

containment. Such enzymes, once limited by extreme sensitivity to oxygen, are now being modified to withstand transient exposures without irreversible loss of catalytic activity. This progress not only enhances the viability of enzymatic systems in real-world settings but also improves their integration into hybrid bioprocesses that require flexibility and robustness.

In alignment with these global research trajectories, ASPIDIA is advancing a scientific program rooted in a multidisciplinary strategy to establish a novel platform for biological hydrogen production. Central to this program is the high-throughput screening of bacterial strains with enhanced fermentative hydrogen production capabilities. Through metagenomic and phenotypic

analyses, ASPIDIA aims to expand the current catalog of hydrogen-producing microbes, especially those adapted to variable redox and substrate conditions.

Parallel to microbial discovery, the project focuses on the bioinformatic identification of novel hydrogenase enzymes, leveraging protein structure prediction and evolutionary modeling to select candidates with improved activity, substrate flexibility, and oxygen tolerance. These efforts feed into the design of synthetic enzymes, created de novo or through rational mutagenesis, with the aim of enhancing catalytic turnover and resistance to inactivation.

To realize practical applications, ASPIDIA employs the yeast Pichia pastoris, widely recognized for its capacity to express high yields of exogenous proteins, as a recombinant host for enzyme production. This system is particularly well-suited for industrial biocatalyst manufacturing due to its scalability, secretion efficiency, and well-characterized fermentation parameters.

These biological innovations are being translated into engineered solutions through the design of next-generation bioreactors. By integrating reaction kinetics, mass transfer modeling, and real-time monitoring, ASPIDIA’s chemical engineering team is developing reactor configurations optimized for

hydrogen output, operational stability, and downstream integration. Artificial intelligence models are also being introduced to guide process control, optimize enzymatic loadings, and enhance reactor performance through predictive analysis and automated adjustments. The design process

emphasizes modularity and energy efficiency, key factors in enabling the deployment of biohydrogen systems.The ASPIDIA project therefore embodies a comprehensive and scientifically rigorous effort to overcome the traditional barriers of biological hydrogen production, aligning with broader trends in green energy research and contributing meaningfully to the pursuit of

sustainable hydrogen technologies.

Why Now is the Time to Invest

Investors and policymakers are uniquely positioned to accelerate biohydrogen adoption:

1. Early market advantage: Companies entering the field now can set standards, capture market share, and influence regulatory frameworks.

2. Innovation synergy: Grants and support for academic-industry partnerships can boost public-private collaboration and drive economic growth.

3. Global demand: Clean hydrogen is essential for the hard-to-abate sectors, including heavy industry and transport.

Conclusion: Toward a Clean Hydrogen Economy

Biological hydrogen production, whether by bacteria or enzymes, offers a green, sustainable alternative to traditional hydrogen sources. Though challenges remain in stability, scalability, and cost, significant progress has been made:

• Dark fermentation proves effective in converting waste to hydrogen with low-cost inputs.

• Hydrogenase enzymes deliver high catalytic efficiency in compact systems.

• With strategic investment and support, biohydrogen could fuel a zero-carbon future, powering homes, industries, and vehicles with clean, biologically generated hydrogen.

References

Albuquerque MM, Sartor GdB, Martinez-Burgos WJ, Scapini T, Edwiges T, Soccol CR, Medeiros ABP.

Biohydrogen Produced via Dark Fermentation: A Review. Methane. 2024; 3(3):500-532. https://doi.org/10.3390/methane3030029

Hardt S, Stapf S, Filmon DT, et al.

Reversible H2 oxidation and evolution by hydrogenase embedded in a redox polymer film. Nat Catal. 2021;4:251-258. doi:10.1038/s41929-021-00586-1

Ji H, Wan L, Gao Y, et al.

Hydrogenase as the basis for green hydrogen production and utilization. J Energy Chem. 2023;85:348-362. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2023.06.018

Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki M, Mockaitis G.

Structural optimization of biohydrogen production: Impact of pretreatments on volatile fatty acids and biogas parameters. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(11):7072-7081. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.088

Mazurenko I, Monsalve K, Infossi P, et al.

Impact of substrate diffusion and enzyme distribution in 3D-porous electrodes: a combined electrochemical and modelling study of a thermostable H2/O2 enzymatic fuel cell. Energy Environ Sci. 2017;10(9):1966-1982. doi:10.1039/C7EE01830D

Mokhtarani B, Zanganeh J, Moghtaderi B.

A Review on Biohydrogen Production Through Dark Fermentation, Process Parameters and Simulation. Energies. 2025; 18(5):1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051092

Mu X, Xu Y, Ma Y, et al.

Functional expression of proton pumps in Rhodobacter sphaeroides enhanced energy supply and photo-fermentative hydrogen production. Bioresour Technol. 2025;432:132666. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132666

Pathy A, Nageshwari K, Ramaraj R, Pragas Maniam G, Govindan N, Balasubramanian

P. Biohydrogen production using algae: Potentiality, economics and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2022;360:127514. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127514

Sanghvi AH, Manjoo A, Rajput P, Mahajan N, Rajamohan N, Abrar I.

Advancements in biohydrogen production - a comprehensive review of technologies, lifecycle analysis, and future scope. RSC Adv. 2024;14(49):36868-36885. Published 2024 Nov 18. doi:10.1039/d4ra06214k

Sickerman NS, Hu Y.

Hydrogenases. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1876:65-88. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8864-8_5

Xuan J, He L, Wen W, Feng Y.

Hydrogenase and Nitrogenase: Key Catalysts in Biohydrogen Production. Molecules. 2023;28(3):1392. Published 2023 Feb 1. doi:10.3390/molecules28031392

Yumnam P, Debnath P.

A Review on Mathematical Modeling of Different Biological Methods of Hydrogen Production. Hydrogen. 2023; 4(4):881-916. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen4040053

Zhang Q, Liu H, Shui X, Li Y, Zhang Z.

Research progress of additives in photobiological hydrogen production system to enhance biohydrogen. Bioresour Technol. 2022;362:127787. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127787